The Best and Worst States to Work in America – during COVID-19

When COVID-19 delivered a shattering blow to the economy in 2020, it put millions of working families at risk of illness, homelessness, and hunger. The federal government response was slow and halting. In the face of great and urgent need, many states took action to shore up safety nets and catch working families at risk of falling.

This index ranks how states and territories are supporting residents during this tumultuous time. Find out more in our report.


Overall score: How states are helping working families

The index has three policy areas: worker protections, healthcare, and unemployment. This map illustrates the combined score. The index ranks all 50 states, plus Washington, DC and Puerto Rico.

AKMEWIVTNHWAIDMTNDMNILMINYMARIORNVWYSDIAINOHPANJCTCAUTCONEMOKYWVVAMDDEAZNMKSARTNNCSCDCOKLAMSALGAHITXFLPR
102030405060708090

State scorecards

Review full information on how each state scores on the full range of labor policies.

View scorecard

The Three Policy Areas: Worker Protections, Healthcare, Unemployment

Select a policy area:
AKMEWIVTNHWAIDMTNDMNILMINYMARIORNVWYSDIAINOHPANJCTCAUTCONEMOKYWVVAMDDEAZNMKSARTNNCSCDCOKLAMSALGAHITXFLPR
102030405060708090

Worker Protections

As a deadly airborne virus, COVID-19 presented an instant challenge to workers and employers. Essential workers need robust protections. Working parents need community supports.

The central question of this area is: Are states and territories taking proactive measures to protect workers and their communities amidst a pandemic?


The Index: How the states rank overall and by policy area

The index is based on three areas, which each comprise a different amount of the overall score: worker protections (45%), healthcare (20%), and unemployment support (35%).

Each state / territory earns a score from 0-100 for each area, which are totaled following the above formula to create the total score. No state or territory scores above 80 overall, though one state scored above 90 in worker protections.

State Rankings, sorted by Worker protections (descending)
3California72.0391.6770.0047.94
4Massachusetts71.6683.3370.0057.59
1Washington76.4183.3366.2573.33
6New York63.9179.1756.2548.67
2New Jersey72.1779.1770.0064.42
7District of Columbia62.9975.0063.7547.10
8Rhode Island61.6768.7555.0056.38
5Connecticut64.0466.6758.7563.68
12Maryland55.4564.5855.0043.98
11Illinois58.4764.5885.0035.46
9Vermont60.2760.4270.0054.52
13Michigan55.3158.3362.5047.30
10Oregon58.5358.3358.7558.65
21Puerto Rico46.3556.2566.2522.26
18Colorado50.7754.1755.0043.99
16Maine51.8654.1755.0047.09
14New Mexico52.6054.1771.2539.92
19Pennsylvania50.0952.0840.0053.29
17Minnesota51.0352.0855.0047.41
22Arizona46.2250.0055.0036.34
15Delaware52.4347.9262.5052.49
41Florida32.7245.8326.2519.57
28Nevada40.9745.8340.0035.27
24Virginia43.2945.8355.0033.32
38North Carolina35.9941.6743.7524.27
26Louisiana42.4141.6752.5037.61
23Hawaii43.3341.6736.2549.52
33Kansas38.0535.4240.0040.32
30Nebraska39.8635.4255.0036.91
27Alaska41.4635.4266.2535.06
32Texas38.1433.3340.0043.25
39Wisconsin35.8731.2532.5043.72
37North Dakota36.8231.2543.7540.01
36West Virginia37.7031.2541.2543.96
46South Carolina27.7629.1725.0027.52
44Tennessee29.4229.1725.0032.27
40Indiana33.8429.1740.0036.34
31Arkansas39.1229.1771.2533.55
20Kentucky47.5329.1770.0058.31
35Montana37.9827.0848.7545.82
29New Hampshire40.5427.0862.5045.28
34Iowa38.0125.0055.0045.03
25Ohio42.8225.0070.0050.19
51Missouri22.0822.9225.0019.35
45Utah29.3620.8362.5021.38
43Idaho29.8420.8362.5022.74
42Oklahoma31.7118.7547.5039.34
52Alabama17.7616.6725.0015.04
49Wyoming24.1416.6740.0024.67
47South Dakota25.8216.6733.7533.05
50Georgia23.0812.5028.7533.45
48Mississippi25.4812.5043.7531.73

Methodology

All data is based on policies and laws in effect between February 15, 2020 and July 1, 2020. Any executive order or state legislation passed after July 1 is not reflected in the index.

View full spreadsheets of the data.

The index is based on state policies and not federal relief efforts. This index does not capture the impact of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, the CARES Act, or the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act.

The index is based on three areas, which each comprise a different amount of the overall score: worker protections (45%), healthcare (20%), and unemployment support (35%).

Worker protections

The central question of this area is: Are states and territories taking proactive measures to protect workers and their communities amidst a pandemic?

Underlying workplace protections (15% of overall score)

  • Mandated paid sick leave
  • Mandated paid family leave
  • Protection against sexual harassment
  • Pregnancy accommodations

COVID-19-era workplace protections (15% of overall score)

  • Protection against forced return to work
  • Protection against retaliation
  • State funded childcare for essential workers
  • State mandated corporate immunity against COVID-19 cases

Community-level protections (15% of overall score)

  • State level loans and grants for small businesses
  • State Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) requirements
  • State-defined essential occupations
  • Social protections in public (face mask requirements)

Healthcare

The central question of this area is: how are states and territories protecting the health of their residents during a pandemic, especially given the limitations of employment linked health insurance?

Healthcare expansions (15% of overall score)

  • Expanded Medicaid access
  • Expanded telehealth services
  • Premium payment grace period
  • Waived cost sharing for COVID-19 treatment
  • Expanded workers compensation due to COVID-19

Transparent case reporting (5% of overall score)

  • Disaggregated COVID-19 data by sex
  • Disaggregated COVID-19 data by race

Unemployment

This dimension of the index asks how states and territories pivoted to support workers unemployed due to COVID-19 as increasing numbers of peoples’ livelihoods were at stake. Included in the pillar are:

COVID-19-era unemployment supports (10% of overall score)

  • Relaxed eligibility criteria
  • Expanded unemployment (past CARES Act)
  • Expanded eligibility for undocumented workers

Underlying unemployment supports (15% of overall score)

  • Ratio of average unemployment benefits vs. cost of living*

COVID-19-era housing and food assistance (10% of overall score)

  • Moratorium on eviction
  • Moratorium on utilities shut off
  • Rent grace period
  • Increased food assistance

* This metric is intended to capture variation in the true coverage a state’s UI system provides versus what is considered a subsistence wage in that state. To calculate this, Oxfam recreated the UI calculation for each state at minimum wage using the Office of Unemployment Insurance’s 2019 resource, assuming the median worker experience, as well as pulling state data on maximum unemployment payments available. A ratio was then taken versus the MIT Living Wage Calculator’s figures for a minimum standard of subsistence for each state, with an approximated value calculated independently for Puerto Rico. These two ratios (minimum unemployment vs. cost of living and maximum unemployment vs. cost of living) were then normalized to a 0-to-1 scale, meaning the state with the best coverage of UI to a subsistence wage received a 1, whereas the worst coverage received a 0. These two normalized scores were then averaged to create each state or territory’s ratio of an average unemployment payment vs cost of living.
Oxfam.org Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Google+
Feedback
Help us improve by sharing your feedback. Thank you for sharing your feedback with us!

How would you rate your experience?

Hate
Dislike
Neutral
Like
Love
Select an element on the page.

Enter your email address if you would like to change your contact or billing information.

Thank you for sharing your feedback with us!

Select an element on the page.