data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eef59/eef59e607fa069fa8f77afd0f2383f9c1cf55bbf" alt=""
WASHINGTON — The United States has discovered nearly $1 trillion in untapped mineral deposits in Afghanistan, far beyond any previously known reserves and enough to fundamentally alter the Afghan economy and perhaps the Afghan war itself, according to senior American government officials.
The previously unknown deposits — including huge veins of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium — are so big and include so many minerals that are essential to modern industry that Afghanistan could eventually be transformed into one of the most important mining centers in the world, the United States officials believe.
An internal Pentagon memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key raw material in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and BlackBerrys.
The vast scale of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth was discovered by a small team of Pentagon officials and American geologists. The Afghan government and President Hamid Karzai were recently briefed, American officials said.
While it could take many years to develop a mining industry, the potential is so great that officials and executives in the industry believe it could attract heavy investment even before mines are profitable, providing the possibility of jobs that could distract from generations of war.
“There is stunning potential here,” Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander of the United States Central Command, said in an interview on Saturday. “There are a lot of ifs, of course, but I think potentially it is hugely significant.”
The value of the newly discovered mineral deposits dwarfs the size of Afghanistan’s existing war-bedraggled economy, which is based largely on opium production and narcotics trafficking as well as aid from the United States and other industrialized countries. Afghanistan’s gross domestic product is only about $12 billion.
“This will become the backbone of the Afghan economy,” said Jalil Jumriany, an adviser to the Afghan minister of mines.
American and Afghan officials agreed to discuss the mineral discoveries at a difficult moment in the war in Afghanistan. The American-led offensive in Marja in southern Afghanistan has achieved only limited gains. Meanwhile, charges of corruption and favoritism continue to plague the Karzai government, and Mr. Karzai seems increasingly embittered toward the White House.
So the Obama administration is hungry for some positive news to come out of Afghanistan. Yet the American officials also recognize that the mineral discoveries will almost certainly have a double-edged impact.
Instead of bringing peace, the newfound mineral wealth could lead the Taliban to battle even more fiercely to regain control of the country.
The corruption that is already rampant in the Karzai government could also be amplified by the new wealth, particularly if a handful of well-connected oligarchs, some with personal ties to the president, gain control of the resources. Just last year, Afghanistan’s minister of mines was accused by American officials of accepting a $30 million bribe to award China the rights to develop its copper mine. The minister has since been replaced.
Endless fights could erupt between the central government in Kabul and provincial and tribal leaders in mineral-rich districts. Afghanistan has a national mining law, written with the help of advisers from the World Bank, but it has never faced a serious challenge.
“No one has tested that law; no one knows how it will stand up in a fight between the central government and the provinces,” observed Paul A. Brinkley, deputy undersecretary of defense for business and leader of the Pentagon team that discovered the deposits.
At the same time, American officials fear resource-hungry China will try to dominate the development of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth, which could upset the United States, given its heavy investment in the region. After winning the bid for its Aynak copper mine in Logar Province, China clearly wants more, American officials said.
Another complication is that because Afghanistan has never had much heavy industry before, it has little or no history of environmental protection either. “The big question is, can this be developed in a responsible way, in a way that is environmentally and socially responsible?” Mr. Brinkley said. “No one knows how this will work.”
With virtually no mining industry or infrastructure in place today, it will take decades for Afghanistan to exploit its mineral wealth fully. “This is a country that has no mining culture,” said Jack Medlin, a geologist in the United States Geological Survey’s international affairs program. “They’ve had some small artisanal mines, but now there could be some very, very large mines that will require more than just a gold pan.”
The mineral deposits are scattered throughout the country, including in the southern and eastern regions along the border with Pakistan that have had some of the most intense combat in the American-led war against the Taliban insurgency.
The Pentagon task force has already started trying to help the Afghans set up a system to deal with mineral development. International accounting firms that have expertise in mining contracts have been hired to consult with the Afghan Ministry of Mines, and technical data is being prepared to turn over to multinational mining companies and other potential foreign investors. The Pentagon is helping Afghan officials arrange to start seeking bids on mineral rights by next fall, officials said.
“The Ministry of Mines is not ready to handle this,” Mr. Brinkley said. “We are trying to help them get ready.”
Like much of the recent history of the country, the story of the discovery of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth is one of missed opportunities and the distractions of war.
In 2004, American geologists, sent to Afghanistan as part of a broader reconstruction effort, stumbled across an intriguing series of old charts and data at the library of the Afghan Geological Survey in Kabul that hinted at major mineral deposits in the country. They soon learned that the data had been collected by Soviet mining experts during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s, but cast aside when the Soviets withdrew in 1989.
During the chaos of the 1990s, when Afghanistan was mired in civil war and later ruled by the Taliban, a small group of Afghan geologists protected the charts by taking them home, and returned them to the Geological Survey’s library only after the American invasion and the ouster of the Taliban in 2001.
“There were maps, but the development did not take place, because you had 30 to 35 years of war,” said Ahmad Hujabre, an Afghan engineer who worked for the Ministry of Mines in the 1970s.
Armed with the old Russian charts, the United States Geological Survey began a series of aerial surveys of Afghanistan’s mineral resources in 2006, using advanced gravity and magnetic measuring equipment attached to an old Navy Orion P-3 aircraft that flew over about 70 percent of the country.
The data from those flights was so promising that in 2007, the geologists returned for an even more sophisticated study, using an old British bomber equipped with instruments that offered a three-dimensional profile of mineral deposits below the earth’s surface. It was the most comprehensive geologic survey of Afghanistan ever conducted.
The handful of American geologists who pored over the new data said the results were astonishing.
But the results gathered dust for two more years, ignored by officials in both the American and Afghan governments. In 2009, a Pentagon task force that had created business development programs in Iraq was transferred to Afghanistan, and came upon the geological data. Until then, no one besides the geologists had bothered to look at the information — and no one had sought to translate the technical data to measure the potential economic value of the mineral deposits.
Soon, the Pentagon business development task force brought in teams of American mining experts to validate the survey’s findings, and then briefed Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Mr. Karzai.
So far, the biggest mineral deposits discovered are of iron and copper, and the quantities are large enough to make Afghanistan a major world producer of both, United States officials said. Other finds include large deposits of niobium, a soft metal used in producing superconducting steel, rare earth elements and large gold deposits in Pashtun areas of southern Afghanistan.
Just this month, American geologists working with the Pentagon team have been conducting ground surveys on dry salt lakes in western Afghanistan where they believe there are large deposits of lithium. Pentagon officials said that their initial analysis at one location in Ghazni Province showed the potential for lithium deposits as large of those of Bolivia, which now has the world’s largest known lithium reserves.
For the geologists who are now scouring some of the most remote stretches of Afghanistan to complete the technical studies necessary before the international bidding process is begun, there is a growing sense that they are in the midst of one of the great discoveries of their careers.
“On the ground, it’s very, very, promising,” Mr. Medlin said. “Actually, it’s pretty amazing.”
1457 Comments
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
The comments section is closed. To send a letter to the editor, write to letters@nytimes.com.
Jake Linco
Media, PA June 14, 2010What Afghanistan needs now is a good Minerals Management Service like we have!
Something tells me that we aren't going to be leaving Afghanistan for a long, long time.
seniorDECISION
USA June 14, 2010Quite amazing! One can only hope that this news helps propel the country forward, not back. And no, the U.S. did not venture into this country because of minerals, but certainly people will assume such an agenda. If possible, it would be interesting to engage multi-national not-for-profit organizations that can oversee and better guarantee that such resources are utilized to benefit the most people.
Nick Lento
Cliffside Park, NJ June 14, 2010This is one more reason to radically change our foreign policy on a *global* scale so that human rights and real democracy is what we are about rather than just propping up monstrous undemocratic dictatorships masquerading as democracies so our "private enterprise" can hook up with artificially cheap natural resources.
We've wasted hundreds of billions of dollars in Afghanistan killing people and engendering more hatred of the USA...and all that's done is make the Taliban (who were hated!) more attractive to many ordinary Afghans.
In our pursuit of "terrorists" we have created more terrorism....which in turn, is good for the commercial interests which enjoy the profits that accrue from our massive expenditures.
We should take a page out of Greg Mortenson's book (Three Cups of Tea) and learn how to spend lots less money more intelligently and in a humane and human manner. The ordinary working people at the bottom of the world's political food chain should be looking toward the USA with respect, love and admiration....and would be if our policies were to materially and unambiguously advance their interests.
If we stay on the utterly ineffective and wasteful course we are now on.....the Taliban will wind up in charge of Afghanistan and they will cut deals with the Chinese to rape their own countryside and exploit their own countrymen. We can/must do better.
dmcinnis
Springfield, Ohio June 14, 2010How quickly I went from elation to despair reading this article. In a better developed country, with better infrastructure, less corrupt government, stronger (or any) gender equality and a decent educational system, this would be the boon of a lifetime. But alas...
And what irony that the border with Pakistan holds such resources.
eliz
Albuquerque, NM June 14, 2010Might the vast mineral resource be known as Unobtainium?
Meyrav Levine
Boston June 14, 2010Hence the reason why we spend a trillion dollars a year on our military-industrial complex to steal resources from other people. Alan Greenspan, in a rare moment of honesty among the ruling elites, declared the following motive for our war of aggression in Iraq:
“I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil”...
Jacque Bauer
Los Angeles June 14, 2010Like the Iraqis, the Afghans will show their appreciation to America for its blood and treasure spent to free the Afghanis, to rebuild their country and in discovering these riches by giving the mineral licenses to these deposits to the Chinese. Don't doubt this for one second...
NS
VA June 14, 2010Nothing good will come out of this as long as Karzai and his brother are in charge. The vultures are already circling. The Chinese want in, the Karzai brothers and cronies want their cut. Warlords want their cut. The Taliban will fight to the death to prevent the foreigners from getting their hand on all this. The Americans and NATO nations spilling their blood feel they deserve the first shot.The bottom line; the Afghan people will get nothing out of this. Their lives will not change one bit. 5% of the population will get fabulously rich, the remaining 95% will continue to live in abject poverty. And so it goes.
Dave Clemens
West Chester, PA June 14, 2010I'm pretty sure minerals had little to do with getting us into Afghanistan. But it's nauseating to see our officialdom trot out minerals now as a reason for staying. Why don't we just admit what we've become and change the name of our country to the Worldwide Empire of America? I can hear the chants now at the 2020 Olympics -- W-E-A, W-E-A.
ecs
New York, N.Y. June 14, 2010"Saudi Arabia of lithium?" How long before we hear "No blood for BlackBerries?"
Manic Drummer
Madison, WI June 14, 2010We should take half of it, since it was Afghanistan who gave al-Qaeda a safehaven. It's the least we could do to get back what we lost on 9-11 and to defray the cost of the war. Iraq, however, is a different story. We should just get out of there.
Christo
Berkeley June 14, 2010Yeah, check out the Congo, Nigeria and other 'resource-rich' countries to find out what the future holds for a country with negligible social structure.
Jenn
Montchauvet June 14, 2010Oh, I'm sure the mineral deposits were discovered long ago. Let's not be naive - why else would so many countries be interested in such a backward place? Russia knew, and England knew. Is America so slow that it only found out yesterday? You think? You wanted to know why we haven't withdrawn our troops? It's easy - Oil in Iraq and Minerals in Afghanistan. D'UH!
Andy Joe
San Francisco, CA June 14, 2010I wonder if knowledge of these elements was really as overlooked as this article suggest. Last year the smarteconomy blog (link below) cited a British Geological Survey report about the rare earth elements and exotic minerals in Afghanistan.
http://smarteconomy.typepad.com...
Peter
UAE June 14, 2010Are we really supposed to be surprised by this? In 2006 I was in Afghanistan as a reporter for a British regional newspaper. I spent nearly two weeks talking to troops and locals about the situation. I did the same in 2007 for nearly three weeks.
On both occasions I asked people why they thought this was so important to NATO countries. After all the landscape was a void of any life, except by the edge of the river and the Taliban showed no signs of going to the West. Indeed the response I got from both senior officers and the foot soldiers was the same - the Taliban weren't going anywhere.
The surprise came from a number of people who told me that Afghanistan's stunning mountain landscape was rich in minerals. Everything was there I was told, from uranium to metals. If these could be accessed then there was a whole new economy. Afghanistan, I was told, had the potential to be one of the world's richest countries.
So ask yourself, if America has 'just identified vast riches of minerals in Afghanistan'.
Lynn Valerie
Great Falls, VA June 14, 2010President Obama finally caught a break! This could alter everything and give Afghanistan the foundation for an economy that is resilient and can grow. The various tribes of Afghanistan now have a reason to unify to protect their bounty. Their potential wealth will be the glue that transforms them into a nation. This is such hopeful news for Afghanistan and its people. Mineral wealth is a game changer. Eventually, poppies will lose their attraction as the Afghan people become aware of the independence this find can offer them. It is a source of pride for the Afghan people. It will allow them to trade goods of great value in the world market.
John Paul
Tuscaloosa, Alabama June 14, 2010Why would a "Pentagon team" be prospecting for minerals in Afghanistan?
Isn't the role of the Pentagon to close with and destroy the enemy?
Are there other interested parties waiting in the wings to exploit the vast mineral resources?
Should taxpayer-funded wars selectively benefit the favored few?
Is this our nation's "payback" for investing lives and treasure in the Graveyard of Empires?
Michael R
Pittsford, New York June 14, 2010For all of the implications of such a discovery, let's not get carried away with this storyline just yet. It didn't take too much effort for me to notice that these unnamed U.S. Pentagon officials, and the New York Times, are peddling at least somewhat of a puff piece. At this stage, a phrase like "the Saudi Arabia of lithium"--uttered before the independent verification of these vast mineral deposits, and before mining operations and 'mining culture' have even sprouted in Afghanistan--strikes me more as campaign-style rhetoric, pushing a hawkish foreign policy goal, than an objective accounting of the potential of this find.
I am all for vast riches being discovered in Afghanistan--but vast questions remain. Again, no objective, on-the-record sources or independent scientists have verified the account. Assuming the truth of these vast riches (and what, exactly, is the basis for the $1 trillion estimate beyond the mere expectation and yes, Hope, of the Pentagon?), don't underestimate the acknowledged timeline for extracting most of these riches: long-term.
It's hard to escape the reality that the same Pentagon officials who are notifying the world of this seemingly hugely significant story also have a strong interest in staying put in Afghanistan. We ought to be on guard for stories like this, number one, but here demand more information and verification before we allow this information to affect our attitude towards Afghanistan.
nrgmstr
pittsburgh June 14, 2010Wow, this is exciting. Let's get Halliburton and BP on it! The Afghan man on the street must be already contemplating the financial windfall that will be his and his family's.
Ted
Sydney June 14, 2010Why is the US out fossicking for minerals? Are they there to bring peace and remove the Taliban, or are they there because they need lithium etc? They sound like colonial masters of old with their flippant manner eg "they're going to need more than a gold pan". How cynical do they think this sounds? They invade Iraq with 15% of the world's oil, and Afghanistan with $1 trillion in minerals. Viva imperialism! This is a disgrace to the armed services - why are they dying? Will service people get a cut?
Eljae
Freehold, NJ June 14, 2010My twenty-three year old son is on his FIRST deployment in Afghanistan. I am SO proud of him and his fellow soldiers, but after reading this article I'm having a hard time being proud of America. Today is Flag Day and I will NOT be flying the flag today, for I am disappointed, disillusioned and distraught that our sons and daughters are PUTTING THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE so some fat cat greedy investors of all nationalities can make more money. I'm sick to my stomach. God bless and protect our soldiers while big shots make big deals and couldn't care less about the value of people's lives, American, Afghani and others.
Andrew
Washington DC June 14, 2010I find it a little hard to believe that we just stumbled over $1 trillion in minerals. We probably knew this at the time we went into Afghanistan but the government only released the information now because we haven't had any good news come out of there for awhile.
Dave B.
New York, NY June 14, 2010The U.S. helped Afghanistan defeat the Russians over 20 years ago and have often been criticized for abandoning them when it was all over. Had we really known about this huge deposit of minerals, and wanted to mine them for the last 20+ years, we would have just stayed there. It would have been much easier for the U.S. to mine and exploit these riches when we were actually loved and hailed as liberators.
To suggest that we went into a war in Afghanistan to exploit their minerals is also to suggest that we orchestrated the justification for that war. Lending credence to the insane conspiracy theorist like Jesse The Body, that George Bush, Dick Cheney and the CIA planed and executed 9/11. I don't believe that.
The question of the day is: Now What?
GiGi
is a trusted commenter Montana June 14, 2010Gather together as many capable young Afghans as are willing and bring them to this country for education at American mining and business schools: crash degree programs, year round, completely paid for by a combination of US government and industry aid. Make it possible for the operation of the mines to be in the hands of young Afghans.
Stone Relics
Seattle, WA June 14, 2010Can you imagine that fact finding mission? An Economic Geologist alongside a couple of Pentagon newbies enveloped in a security bubble provided by US Marines walked into a bar in Baluchistan...
1457 Comments
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
The comments section is closed. To send a letter to the editor, write to letters@nytimes.com.